"The basic moral problem that faces man as he moves
into the age of
automation, the age of accelerating
conquest of nature, is whether he is really fit to
live in an industrial society; whether his
institutions will adjust rapidly enough; whether he
will rivet himself with an absurd institution like
full
employment in the economic order when it
is not only unnecessary but unadministratable in
anything but a slave society; whether freed from the
necessity to devote his brain and brawn to the
production of goods and services, he can address
himself to the work of civilization itself." (Louis O. Kelso, 1964)
ESOP:
Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The
ESOP is designed to build capital ownership into
employees of a business in the course of
efficiently financing its growth or other
worthwhile corporate objectives, without
touching employee paychecks or savings. As to
employees, the ESOP is that
constitutionally-mandated missing link that
gives them access to credit to buy the
employer's capital stock and, without personal
risk or liability, to pay for it from the
pre-tax earnings of the assets underlying that
stock. In other words, equalizing their access
to capital credit with that of the already rich.
MUCOP: Mutual Capital
Ownership Plan. This financing method is
intended to provide pooled ESOP financing for a
number of corporations while building
diversified portfolios of their stocks
individually for their employees.
CSOP: Consumer Stock
Ownership Plan. This technique is intended for
use by public utilities, banks, insurance
companies, and other businesses where long-term
relationships between the producer and its
customers are the rule. Through the intelligent
use of credit, it builds capital ownership for
customers while providing unlimited low-cost
financing for growth of the corporation, thus
raising the power of the consumers to pay for
their purchases of goods and services while
raising the power of the corporation to produce
goods and services. It would normally be used in
conjunction with an ESOP for employees.
GSOP: General Stock
Ownership Plan. The GSOP is designed to build
capital ownership into politically designated
classes of consumers within the jurisdiction of
the authorizing government - state, local or
federal.
ICOP: Individual Capital
Ownership Plan. A financing device intended to
create viable capital estates for selected
categories of individuals while opening broad
markets for equity financing by corporations.
RECOP: Residential
Capital Ownership Plan. This financing plan, in
combination with commercially insured credit
financing, would enable home buyers to purchase
homes at less than 25 percent of the
out-of-pocket principal and interest cost of
similar transactions today, by having their
acquisitions treated by tax and other relevant
laws as capital assets, rather than as consumer
items as at present
COMCOP: Commercial
Capital Ownership Plan. Ownership of rental
structures, such as office and apartment
buildings, factories, mines, railroads, hotels,
resorts, etc., is a major source of capital cash
income. Today such structures and real estate
generally are owned by the excessively wealthy
(whose resulting income is thereby sterilized
for purposes of the consumer economy and denied
to those who could use it if the financing had
been COMCOP structured), who use such
acquisitions not only to satisfy their
antisocial greed, but to wipe out their income
taxes. COMCOP would enable commercial structure
ownership legitimately to be spread over large
numbers of people where it can raise their power
to produce the incomes they need to make them
powerful and self-supporting consumers, maintain
their lifestyles, and to diversify their
holdings in businesses in which they become
employed as capital workers.
PUBCOP: Public Capital
Ownership Plan. This plan is designed to provide
low-cost financing for capital instruments used
by public bodies of all types - office
buildings, streets and sidewalks, parks, street
lighting, schools, universities, subways,
waterworks, harbors, etc. It permits broad
individual ownership, through facilities
corporations, by great numbers of people, while
providing low-cost capital facilities to be
leased at market rates to cities and other
municipal corporations, states, the federal
government, and other public bodies. PUBCOP is
another tool in the arsenal of binary economics
to assure that each individual can become
employed as a capital worker and that
governments do not acquire economic power that
should be diffused throughout the citizenry.
PUBCOP financing would employ the dual functions
of binary financing devices. It would be a major
means of eliminating the cost of wasteful,
inefficient, and inadequate public employee
pensions while providing much greater economic
security and incomes, both before and after
retirement, to public employees and others.
All of these plans are discussed
and diagramed in more detail in Democracy and
Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution
through Binary Economics.
All rights
reserved under International and Pan
American Copyright Conventions.
Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number:61-6562
Louis Kelso's books,
The Capitalist
Manifesto and
The New Capitalists,
are now available to download in PDF form.
You will need the
Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print
them.
The
Capitalist Manifesto and
The New Capitalists
together comprise the first public statement of
Louis Kelso's seminal contribution to political
economics - a thesis Mortimer J. Adler, the
co-author, declared "the first clear and
systematic statement of the idea of capitalism
that has ever been presented to the world."
Despite its Cold War title,
The Capitalist Manifesto
of 1958 is neither a defense of traditional
capitalism nor a polemical call to revolution in
the style of The
Communist Manifesto of 1848. It is a
theoretical blueprint of the physical and
institutional structure of the western private
property, free market system identified by Adam
Smith and the classical economists; repudiated
by Karl Marx and the socialists,
and pragmatically compromised by J. Maynard
Keynes. It presents specific proposals for
correcting and perfecting the present system in
the line of, and in the light of, its own logic
and principles. It invites men and women of good
will to set to work on the task of building an
economically just and generally affluent society
on the foundation of a Capitalism redeemed of
its historical flaws.
Louis Kelso's vision of
Capitalism was, in Dr. Adler's description, "the
economically free and classless society which
supports political democracy and which, above
all, helps political democracy to preserve the
institutions of a free society." To Dr. Adler's
mind, this conception was "the most
revolutionary idea of the century."
Ten years after his death Louis
Kelso is beginning to be recognized as the
originator of a genuinely new paradigm in
political economics. Although introduced more
than forty years ago, its concepts are still
virgin terrain because, despite their osmotic
influence in the United States, western and
eastern Europe, Russia and now China, relatively
few people are familiar with them.
Make no mistake, Louis Kelso's
ideas are just as controversial today as when he
and Dr. Adler introduced them in 1958. The
Austrian economist Schumpeter famously defined
Capitalism as "creative destruction." That is
also the effect of a new paradigm on its parent
discipline. Louis Kelso's new paradigm targets,
first of all, the conventional premises of
economics. But since those premises are also
embedded in western political, economic and
business institutions, particularly the
institutions of finance, Louis Kelso's binary
view exposes the fallacies at their heart as
well.
In showing the obsolete ideas at
the root of key institutions - the institutions
that concentrate wealth and frustrate the
operating logic of the free market - Louis Kelso
changes the terms of the age-old debate between
Conservatives and Liberals and Capital and
Labor. And in doing that, he moves to new and
higher ground the ideological issues that have
made western society a battleground ever since
the Industrial Revolution. To understand Louis
Kelso's binary paradigm is to look at the
economic and political world with new eyes, from
an exhilarating new perspective. The social
implications of this new view are revolutionary
in the best sense of that word.
Louis Kelso was fascinated by
technology. He began his investigation of the
Great Depression with painstaking research on
the effects of technological change on
occupations, industries and the macro-economy.
While still in law school, he published a
monograph on how the computer, hardly invented
then, would revolutionize the practice of law.
He eagerly looked forward to the day when the
computer would make instantaneous world-wide
communication possible. Unfortunately he died a
few years before the Internet could make this a
reality for him.
Now as we enter the new century
and the new millennium, Louis Kelso's binary
economic paradigm is even more important than
when first introduced. The demise of the Soviet
Union has left the western market economy free
to dominate the world on its own terms.
Understanding market forces and learning how to
exploit them to build stable industrial
democracies that are also Good Societies for
everyone who lives in them is our most urgent
task. Louis Kelso has given us the tools - both
conceptual and practical - to accomplish this
task. He has also inspired us with his generous
vision of the Good Society that advanced
technology still promises despite centuries of
misunderstanding and misuse.
In gratitude for the life
and work of Louis Kelso, and also in honor of
his co-author, the late Mortimer J. Adler, whose
encouragement and collaboration made these books
possible, the Kelso Institute takes great
pleasure in electronically publishing both
The Capitalist
Manifesto and The New Capitalists.
In so doing, we fulfill Louis Kelso's dearest
wish in life - that his ideas be made accessible
to those who will use them to build institutions
that advance civilization and support
individuals in realizing their highest
potential.
Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter Kelso
estimates of the relative real inputs to production in the
American economy of Labor (Physical and Intellectual) and
Capital over time assuming reasonably competitive markets.
So ingrained is the “ethic” of the “Labor Theory of Value”
that they thought it best to refer to Capital Owners as
“Capital Workers” in keeping with their understanding that
Capital instruments do “Work” - as surely as the most
diligent human surrogate worker – and that indeed the
observable trend is for Capital Instruments to do ever more
of the Worlds “Work”. The reflexive prevalent attitude of
equating “Economic” man with Essential Human Values
including the whole vast array of values around the “Work
Ethic” all contribute to camouflage and maintain the
fundamental miss-match between the way goods and services
are produced and distributed and particularly their trends
projected into the future. Cybernetic contributions (now
almost exponential) are only adding to the much longer
Historical trend. Represents US Economy but applies to World
trending. HHC
Chart of
concentration of capital ownership in the U.S. over time.
The same general pattern applies to virtually all economies
of and the World Economy as a whole – Plutocratic ownership
and control of the real means of production. With “The
Labor Theory of Value” it only worsens. HHC - Below Quotes
@
www.kelsoinstitute.org
"Conventional wisdom says there is only one
way to earn a living, and that's to work. Conventional
wisdom effectively treats capital (land, structures,
machines, and the like) as though it were a kind of holy
water that, sprinkled on or about labor, makes it more
productive. Thus, if you have a thousand people working in a
factory and you increase the design and power of the
machinery so that one hundred men can now do what a thousand
did before, conventional wisdom says, 'Voila! The
productivity of the labor has gone up 900 percent!' I say
'hogwash.' All you've done is wipe out 90 percent of the
jobs, and even the remaining ten percent are probably
sitting around pushing buttons. What the economy needs is a
way of legitimately getting capital
ownership into the hands of the people who
now don't have it." (Louis O.
Kelso, Journal Asset Based Finance, 1982)
"The trouble with today's techniques of
finance is that they're designed to make the rich richer.
None are designed to make the poor richer. That's why the
poor are poor. Because they're not rich." (Louis O.
Kelso, San Francisco Examiner & Chronicle, 1978)
"The Roman arena was technically a level
playing field. But on one side were the lions with all the
weapons, and on the other the Christians with all the blood.
That's not a level playing field. That's a slaughter. And so
is putting people into the economy without equipping them
with capital, while equipping a tiny handful of people with
hundreds and thousands of times morethan they can use." (Louis O.
Kelso, Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas, 1990)
Keynes, turning from economics to philosophy in his 1930
essay “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren” foresaw
it all:
“We are being afflicted with a new disease of which some
readers may not yet have heard the name, but of which they
will hear a great deal of in the years to come-namely
technological unemployment. This means unemployment due to
our discovery of means of economizing the use of labor
outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses of labor
….This means that the economic problem is not, if we look
into the future, the permanent problem of the human race.”
Keynes goes on to say that once the economic problem is
solved, mankind will be deprived of its traditional purpose
and will be faced with the real problem, which economics
will have won: how to live wisely, agreeably and well. He
doesn’t think that this will be welcomed by all.
“There is no country and no people, I think, who can look
forward to the age of abundance without dread”
but ultimately
“When
the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social
importance, there will be a great changes in the code of
morals … we shall be able to assess the money motive at its
true value.”
Charles Handy citing the 1930 reference by
Lord John Maynard Keynes projecting “Technological
Unemployment”
for the future world of his grandchildren.
That would be right about now as technological advancement
not only
provides the possible means for Humanity’s
collective “Transcendence of Scarcity” but poses the problem
to
progressives by their commitment (along with
virtually all economic theorizing) to the “Labor Theory of
Value”
currently informing virtually all National
Economies on Planet Earth & the International System as
well. HHC
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic
thinker who sought to find a way to preserve
capitalism from
the competition of
communism as an
alternative within the context of the early
Cold War.
Louis O. Kelso
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Louis O. Kelso
(1913-1991) was a
lawyer
and
economic
thinker who sought to find a way to preserve
capitalism
from the competition of
communism
as an alternative within the context of the early
Cold War.
His non-conformist
"capitalism" might be compared to the
peoples' capitalism
ideas of
G. K. Chesterton
in which ownership is distributed to as many people as
possible within the economy. Kelso developed the idea of
Binary Economics
to explain the need for expanded capital ownership in
light of industrial production and the dominance of
capital instead of labor.
In 1956 Louis Kelso
invented the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to put
his ideas into practice. In 1958 he collaborated with
the philosopher
Mortimer Adler
to write The Capitalist Manifesto that is considered the
primary source of his economic theories. Kelso and Adler
followed this book with The New Capitalists (Random
House, New York: 1961). Both books are readable online
from the Kelso Institute.
Kelso has inspired
many economic thinkers including
James S. Albus,
Robert Ashford, and Norman Kurland
begin_of_the_skype_highlightingend_of_the_skype_highlighting.
The distributive
dynamics of capitalism by Louis O Kelso,
self-published; 2nd edition (1956)
The Capitalist
Manifesto, by Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler,
Random House, New York: 1958; reprinted Greenwood
Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975. Also published
in French, Spanish, Greek and Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8210-7
The New Capitalists:
A Proposal to Free Economic Growth from the Slavery
of Savings, by Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler,
Random House, New York: 1961; reprinted Greenwood
Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975. Also published
in Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8211-5
Two-Factor Theory:
The Economics of Reality, by Louis O. Kelso and
Patricia Hetter, Random House, New York: 1967;
paperback edition, Vintage Books: 1968. (Originally
published under the title How to Turn 80 Million
Workers into Capitalists on Borrowed Money.) Also
published in Spanish and German.
Democracy and
Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution
Through Binary Economics, by Louis O. Kelso and
Patricia Hetter Kelso, Ballinger Publishing Co.,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1986; reprinted by
University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland: 1991.
Also available in Russian and Chinese.
ISBN 0-8191-7909-4
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O.
KELSO
Karl Marx: The Almost
Capitalist, American Bar Association Journal, March,
1957.
[2]
Corporate Benevolence
or Welfare Redistribution?, The Business Lawyer,
January, 1960.
Labor's Great
Mistake: The Struggle for the Toil State, American
Bar Association Journal, February, 1960.
Welfare State -
American Style, Challenge, The Magazine of Economic
Affairs, New York University, October, 1963.
The Case for the 100%
Dividend Payout, Trends (published by Georgeson &
Co.), New York, December, 1963.
Poverty and Profits,
by Hostetler, Kelso, Long, Oates, the Editors,
Harvard Business Review, September-October, 1964.
Beyond Full
Employment, Title News (the Journal of the American
Land Title Association), November, 1964.
Cooperatives and the
Economic Power to Consume, The Cooperative
Accountant (published by the National Society of
Accountants for Cooperatives), Winter, 1964.
Why Not
Featherbedding?, Challenge, September-October 1966.
(Reprinted in American Controversy: Readings and
Rhetoric, by Paul K. Dempsey and Ronald E.
McFarland, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview,
Illinois: 1968.)
The Economic
Foundation of Freedom, The American Prospect:
Insights into Our Next 100 Years, Houghton Mifflin
Company, Boston: 1977.
Labor's Untapped
Wealth: An Address by Louis Kelso, Air Line Pilot,
October, 1984.
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O.
KELSO AND PATRICIA HETTER KELSO
Uprooting World
Poverty: A Job for Business, Business Horizons,
Fall, 1964. (Reprinted in Mercurio, Anno VIII, No.
8, Rome, Italy, August, 1965; Far Eastern Economic
Review, Vol. L, No. 1, Hong Kong, October, 1965.
Winner of the First Place 1964 McKinsey Award for
Significant Business Writing.)
Poverty's Other Exit,
North Dakota Law Review, January, 1965.
Equality of Economic
Opportunity Through Capital Ownership, Social
Policies for America in the Seventies, edited by
Robert Theobald, Doubleday & Co., New York: 1968.
(Excerpts from this essay reprinted in Current,
April, 1968.)
Reparations and the
Churches, Business Horizons, December, 1969.
Invisible Violence of
Corporate Finance, The Washington Post, June 18,
1972.
Man Without Property,
Business and Society Review, Summer, 1972.
Corporate Social
Responsibility Without Corporate Suicide, Challenge,
July-August, 1973.
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Business & Government Insider
Newsletter, July 30, August 6 and August 13, 1973.
Employee Stock
Ownership Plans: A Micro-Application of
Macro-Economic Theory, The American University Law
Review, Spring, 1977.
The Greatest
Financial Planning Tool of All . . . Could ESOP Save
General Motors?, The Financial Planner, November,
1981.
Sychophantasy in
Economics: A Review of
George Gilder's
Wealth and Poverty, The Great Ideas Today,
Encyclopœdia Britannica, Inc., Chicago: 1982.
The Right to Be
Productive, The Financial Planner, August and
September, 1982.
Tax Reform Is Not the
Answer, Chief Executive, Spring, 1983.
How We Can Achieve
Lifetime Employment, Chief Executive, Autumn, 1983.
Damning Binary
Economics With Faint Praise, Workplace Democracy,
Summer, 1987.
Leveraged Buyouts
Good and Bad, Management Review, November, 1987.
The Great Savings
Snafu, Business and Society Review, Winter, 1988.
Why Owner-Workers Are
Winners, The New York Times, January 29, 1989.
Why I Invented the
ESOP LBO, Leaders, October/November/December, 1989.
Don't Meddle With
ESOPs, The Journal of Commerce, October 2, 1989.
Looking in a Marxist
Mirror, The Journal of Commerce, January 11, 1991.
ALSO RECOMMENDED -
BOOKS
Curing World Poverty:
The New Role of Property, edited by John H. Miller,
C.S.C., S.T.D., Social Justice Review, St. Louis:
1994.
Binary Economics: The
New Paradigm, by Robert Ashford and Rodney
Shakespeare, University Press of America, Lanham,
Maryland: 1999.
ALSO RECOMMENDED -
WRITINGS
The ESOP According to
Kelso, by Stuart Nixon, Air Line Pilot, October,
1984.
The World According
to Kelso, by Steven Hayward, Inland Business, April,
1987.
Louis Kelso,
Capitalist, Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas II, edited
by Andie Tucher, Doubleday, New York: 1990.
The Binary Economics
of Louis Kelso: The Promise of Universal Capitalism,
by Robert H. A. Ashford, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol.
22, No. 1, Fall, 1990.
Louis Kelso's Binary
Economy, by Robert Ashford, The Journal of
Socio-Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1996.
Binary Economic Modes
for the Privatization of Public Assets, by Jerry N.
Gauche, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 27, No.
3, 1998.
A New Market Paradigm
for Sustainable Growth: Financing Broader Capital
Ownership with Louis Kelso's Binary Economics, by
Robert Ashford, Praxis: The Fletcher Journal of
Development Studies, Vol. XIV, The Fletcher School
of Law and Diplomacy, Global Development and
Environment Institute, Tufts University, Medford,
Massachusetts: 1998.
The Theory of
Productiveness: A Microeconomic and Macroeconomic
Analysis of Binary Growth and Output in the Kelso
System, by Stephen V. Kane, The Journal of
Socio-Economics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2000.
The Ultimate
Management Team, by Chris Bayers, WIRED, January,
2002.
Employee Ownership
and Corporate Performance: A Comprehensive Review of
the Evidence, The Journal of Employee Ownership Law
and Finance, Vol. 14, No. 1, National Center for
Employee Ownership (NCEO), Oakland, California:
2002.
Binary Economics,
Fiduciary Duties, and Corporate Social
Responsibility: Comprehending Corporate Wealth
Maximization and Distribution for Stockholders,
Stakeholders, and Society, by Robert Ashford, Tulane
Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 5-6, June, 2002.
"The Roman arena
was technically a
level playing field.
But on one side were the lions with all the weapons,
and on the other the Christians with all the blood.
That's not a level playing field. That's a
slaughter. And so is putting people into the economy
without equipping them with capital, while equipping
a tiny handful of people with hundreds and thousands
of times more than they can use."
--Louis O. Kelso
in
Bill Moyers:
A World of Ideas, (1990)
Individual programs can be
viewed each week dayHosthmH
(11:00
AM - NOON / (NYC Time)
Channel 34 of the Time/Warner, Channel
83 of the RCN, & Channel 33 of the VerizonFiOS
Cable Television Systems in Manhattan, New
York.
The Program can now also be viewed on the
internet at time of cable casting at:
WWW.MNN.ORGw.
NOTE: You must adjust viewing to reflect NYC time
& click on channel 34 at site