"The basic moral problem that faces man as he moves
into the age of automation, the age of accelerating
conquest of nature, is whether he is really fit to
live in an industrial society; whether his
institutions will adjust rapidly enough; whether he
will rivet himself with an absurd institution like
full employment in the economic order when it is not
only unnecessary but unadministratable in anything
but a slave society; whether freed from the
necessity to devote his brain and brawn to the
production of goods and services, he can address
himself to the work of civilization itself." (Louis O. Kelso, 1964)
ESOP: Employee Stock
Ownership Plan. The ESOP is designed to build
capital ownership into employees of a business
in the course of efficiently financing its
growth or other worthwhile corporate objectives,
without touching employee paychecks or savings.
As to employees, the ESOP is that
constitutionally-mandated missing link that
gives them access to credit to buy the
employer's capital stock and, without personal
risk or liability, to pay for it from the
pre-tax earnings of the assets underlying that
stock. In other words, equalizing their access
to capital credit with that of the already rich.
MUCOP: Mutual Capital
Ownership Plan. This financing method is
intended to provide pooled ESOP financing for a
number of corporations while building
diversified portfolios of their stocks
individually for their employees.
CSOP: Consumer Stock
Ownership Plan. This technique is intended for
use by public utilities, banks, insurance
companies, and other businesses where long-term
relationships between the producer and its
customers are the rule. Through the intelligent
use of credit, it builds capital ownership for
customers while providing unlimited low-cost
financing for growth of the corporation, thus
raising the power of the consumers to pay for
their purchases of goods and services while
raising the power of the corporation to produce
goods and services. It would normally be used in
conjunction with an ESOP for employees.
GSOP: General Stock
Ownership Plan. The GSOP is designed to build
capital ownership into politically designated
classes of consumers within the jurisdiction of
the authorizing government - state, local or
federal.
ICOP: Individual Capital
Ownership Plan. A financing device intended to
create viable capital estates for selected
categories of individuals while opening broad
markets for equity financing by corporations.
RECOP: Residential
Capital Ownership Plan. This financing plan, in
combination with commercially insured credit
financing, would enable home buyers to purchase
homes at less than 25 percent of the
out-of-pocket principal and interest cost of
similar transactions today, by having their
acquisitions treated by tax and other relevant
laws as capital assets, rather than as consumer
items as at present
COMCOP: Commercial
Capital Ownership Plan. Ownership of rental
structures, such as office and apartment
buildings, factories, mines, railroads, hotels,
resorts, etc., is a major source of capital cash
income. Today such structures and real estate
generally are owned by the excessively wealthy
(whose resulting income is thereby sterilized
for purposes of the consumer economy and denied
to those who could use it if the financing had
been COMCOP structured), who use such
acquisitions not only to satisfy their
antisocial greed, but to wipe out their income
taxes. COMCOP would enable commercial structure
ownership legitimately to be spread over large
numbers of people where it can raise their power
to produce the incomes they need to make them
powerful and self-supporting consumers, maintain
their lifestyles, and to diversify their
holdings in businesses in which they become
employed as capital workers.
PUBCOP: Public Capital
Ownership Plan. This plan is designed to provide
low-cost financing for capital instruments used
by public bodies of all types - office
buildings, streets and sidewalks, parks, street
lighting, schools, universities, subways,
waterworks, harbors, etc. It permits broad
individual ownership, through facilities
corporations, by great numbers of people, while
providing low-cost capital facilities to be
leased at market rates to cities and other
municipal corporations, states, the federal
government, and other public bodies. PUBCOP is
another tool in the arsenal of binary economics
to assure that each individual can become
employed as a capital worker and that
governments do not acquire economic power that
should be diffused throughout the citizenry.
PUBCOP financing would employ the dual functions
of binary financing devices. It would be a major
means of eliminating the cost of wasteful,
inefficient, and inadequate public employee
pensions while providing much greater economic
security and incomes, both before and after
retirement, to public employees and others.
All of these plans are discussed
and diagramed in more detail in Democracy and
Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution
through Binary Economics.
All rights
reserved under International and Pan
American Copyright Conventions.
Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number:61-6562
Louis Kelso's books,
The Capitalist
Manifesto and
The New Capitalists,
are now available to download in PDF form.
You will need the
Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print
them.
The
Capitalist Manifesto and
The New Capitalists
together comprise the first public statement of
Louis Kelso's seminal contribution to political
economics - a thesis Mortimer J. Adler, the
co-author, declared "the first clear and
systematic statement of the idea of capitalism
that has ever been presented to the world."
Despite its Cold War title,
The Capitalist Manifesto
of 1958 is neither a defense of traditional
capitalism nor a polemical call to revolution in
the style of The
Communist Manifesto of 1848. It is a
theoretical blueprint of the physical and
institutional structure of the western private
property, free market system identified by Adam
Smith and the classical economists; repudiated
by Karl Marx and the socialists,
and pragmatically compromised by J. Maynard
Keynes. It presents specific proposals for
correcting and perfecting the present system in
the line of, and in the light of, its own logic
and principles. It invites men and women of good
will to set to work on the task of building an
economically just and generally affluent society
on the foundation of a Capitalism redeemed of
its historical flaws.
Louis Kelso's vision of
Capitalism was, in Dr. Adler's description, "the
economically free and classless society which
supports political democracy and which, above
all, helps political democracy to preserve the
institutions of a free society." To Dr. Adler's
mind, this conception was "the most
revolutionary idea of the century."
Ten years after his death Louis
Kelso is beginning to be recognized as the
originator of a genuinely new paradigm in
political economics. Although introduced more
than forty years ago, its concepts are still
virgin terrain because, despite their osmotic
influence in the United States, western and
eastern Europe, Russia and now China, relatively
few people are familiar with them.
Make no mistake, Louis Kelso's
ideas are just as controversial today as when he
and Dr. Adler introduced them in 1958. The
Austrian economist Schumpeter famously defined
Capitalism as "creative destruction." That is
also the effect of a new paradigm on its parent
discipline. Louis Kelso's new paradigm targets,
first of all, the conventional premises of
economics. But since those premises are also
embedded in western political, economic and
business institutions, particularly the
institutions of finance, Louis Kelso's binary
view exposes the fallacies at their heart as
well.
In showing the obsolete ideas at
the root of key institutions - the institutions
that concentrate wealth and frustrate the
operating logic of the free market - Louis Kelso
changes the terms of the age-old debate between
Conservatives and Liberals and Capital and
Labor. And in doing that, he moves to new and
higher ground the ideological issues that have
made western society a battleground ever since
the Industrial Revolution. To understand Louis
Kelso's binary paradigm is to look at the
economic and political world with new eyes, from
an exhilarating new perspective. The social
implications of this new view are revolutionary
in the best sense of that word.
Louis Kelso was fascinated by
technology. He began his investigation of the
Great Depression with painstaking research on
the effects of technological change on
occupations, industries and the macro-economy.
While still in law school, he published a
monograph on how the computer, hardly invented
then, would revolutionize the practice of law.
He eagerly looked forward to the day when the
computer would make instantaneous world-wide
communication possible. Unfortunately he died a
few years before the Internet could make this a
reality for him.
Now as we enter the new century
and the new millennium, Louis Kelso's binary
economic paradigm is even more important than
when first introduced. The demise of the Soviet
Union has left the western market economy free
to dominate the world on its own terms.
Understanding market forces and learning how to
exploit them to build stable industrial
democracies that are also Good Societies for
everyone who lives in them is our most urgent
task. Louis Kelso has given us the tools - both
conceptual and practical - to accomplish this
task. He has also inspired us with his generous
vision of the Good Society that advanced
technology still promises despite centuries of
misunderstanding and misuse.
In gratitude for the life
and work of Louis Kelso, and also in honor of
his co-author, the late Mortimer J. Adler, whose
encouragement and collaboration made these books
possible, the Kelso Institute takes great
pleasure in electronically publishing both
The Capitalist
Manifesto and The New Capitalists.
In so doing, we fulfill Louis Kelso's dearest
wish in life - that his ideas be made accessible
to those who will use them to build institutions
that advance civilization and support
individuals in realizing their highest
potential.
Louis O. Kelso and Patricia
Hetter Kelso estimates of the relative real
inputs to production in the American economy
of Labor (Physical and Intellectual) and
Capital over time assuming reasonably
competitive markets. So ingrained is the
“ethic” of the “Labor Theory of Value” that
they thought it best to refer to Capital
Owners as “Capital Workers” in keeping with
their understanding that Capital instruments
do “Work” - as surely as the most diligent
human surrogate worker – and that indeed the
observable trend is for Capital Instruments
to do ever more of the Worlds “Work”. The
reflexive prevalent attitude of equating
“Economic” man with Essential Human Values
including the whole vast array of values
around the “Work Ethic” all contribute to
camouflage and maintain the fundamental
miss-match between the way goods and
services are produced and distributed and
particularly their trends projected into the
future. Cybernetic contributions (now almost
exponential) are only adding to the much
longer Historical trend. Represents US
Economy but applies to World trending. HHC
Chart of concentration of capital ownership in the U.S. over
time. The same general pattern applies to virtually all
economies of and the World Economy as a whole – Plutocratic
ownership and control of the real means of production. With
“The Labor Theory of Value” it only worsens.
This is a blog about human rights – including political and economic
human rights such as the right to participate in government
(democracy being a subset of
human rights) and the right not to
suffer poverty – seen from the perspective of politics, art,
philosophy (hence p.a.p.), law, economics and statistic
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic thinker who sought to find a way to
preserve
capitalism from the competition of
communism as an alternative within the context of
the early
Cold War.
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic thinker who sought to find a way to
preserve
capitalism from the competition of
communism as an alternative within the context of
the early
Cold War.
His non-conformist "capitalism" might be compared to
the
peoples' capitalism ideas of
G. K. Chesterton in which ownership is distributed
to as many people as possible within the economy. Kelso
developed the idea of
Binary Economics to explain the need for expanded
capital ownership in light of industrial production and
the dominance of capital instead of labor.
In 1956 Louis Kelso invented the Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (ESOP) to put his ideas into practice. In
1958 he collaborated with the philosopher
Mortimer Adler to write The Capitalist Manifesto
that is considered the primary source of his economic
theories. Kelso and Adler followed this book with The
New Capitalists (Random House, New York: 1961). Both
books are readable online from the Kelso Institute.
The distributive dynamics of capitalism
by Louis O Kelso, self-published; 2nd edition (1956)
The Capitalist Manifesto, by Louis O.
Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler, Random House, New York:
1958; reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport,
Connecticut: 1975. Also published in French,
Spanish, Greek and Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8210-7
The New Capitalists: A Proposal to Free
Economic Growth from the Slavery of Savings, by
Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler, Random House,
New York: 1961; reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport,
Connecticut: 1975. Also published in Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8211-5
Two-Factor Theory: The Economics of Reality,
by Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter, Random House,
New York: 1967; paperback edition, Vintage Books:
1968. (Originally published under the title How
to Turn 80 Million Workers into Capitalists on
Borrowed Money.) Also published in Spanish and
German.
Democracy and Economic Power: Extending the
ESOP Revolution Through Binary Economics, by
Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter Kelso, Ballinger
Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1986;
reprinted by University Press of America, Lanham,
Maryland: 1991. Also available in Russian and
Chinese.
ISBN 0-8191-7909-4
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO
Karl Marx: The Almost Capitalist, American Bar
Association Journal, March, 1957.
[2]
Corporate Benevolence or Welfare
Redistribution?, The Business Lawyer, January, 1960.
Labor's Great Mistake: The Struggle for the Toil
State, American Bar Association Journal, February,
1960.
Welfare State - American Style, Challenge, The
Magazine of Economic Affairs, New York University,
October, 1963.
The Case for the 100% Dividend Payout, Trends
(published by Georgeson & Co.), New York, December,
1963.
Poverty and Profits, by Hostetler, Kelso, Long,
Oates, the Editors, Harvard Business Review,
September-October, 1964.
Beyond Full Employment, Title News (the Journal
of the American Land Title Association), November,
1964.
Cooperatives and the Economic Power to Consume,
The Cooperative Accountant (published by the
National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives),
Winter, 1964.
Why Not Featherbedding?, Challenge,
September-October 1966. (Reprinted in American
Controversy: Readings and Rhetoric, by Paul K.
Dempsey and Ronald E. McFarland, Scott, Foresman and
Company, Glenview, Illinois: 1968.)
The Economic Foundation of Freedom, The American
Prospect: Insights into Our Next 100 Years, Houghton
Mifflin Company, Boston: 1977.
Labor's Untapped Wealth: An Address by Louis
Kelso, Air Line Pilot, October, 1984.
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO AND PATRICIA HETTER KELSO
Uprooting World Poverty: A Job for Business,
Business Horizons, Fall, 1964. (Reprinted in
Mercurio, Anno VIII, No. 8, Rome, Italy, August,
1965; Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. L, No. 1,
Hong Kong, October, 1965. Winner of the First Place
1964 McKinsey Award for Significant Business
Writing.)
Poverty's Other Exit, North Dakota Law Review,
January, 1965.
Equality of Economic Opportunity Through Capital
Ownership, Social Policies for America in the
Seventies, edited by Robert Theobald, Doubleday &
Co., New York: 1968. (Excerpts from this essay
reprinted in Current, April, 1968.)
Reparations and the Churches, Business Horizons,
December, 1969.
Invisible Violence of Corporate Finance, The
Washington Post, June 18, 1972.
Man Without Property, Business and Society
Review, Summer, 1972.
Corporate Social Responsibility Without
Corporate Suicide, Challenge, July-August, 1973.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Business &
Government Insider Newsletter, July 30, August 6 and
August 13, 1973.
Employee Stock Ownership Plans: A
Micro-Application of Macro-Economic Theory, The
American University Law Review, Spring, 1977.
The Greatest Financial Planning Tool of All . .
. Could ESOP Save General Motors?, The Financial
Planner, November, 1981.
Sychophantasy in Economics: A Review of
George Gilder's Wealth and Poverty, The Great
Ideas Today, Encyclopœdia Britannica, Inc., Chicago:
1982.
The Right to Be Productive, The Financial
Planner, August and September, 1982.
Tax Reform Is Not the Answer, Chief Executive,
Spring, 1983.
How We Can Achieve Lifetime Employment, Chief
Executive, Autumn, 1983.
Damning Binary Economics With Faint Praise,
Workplace Democracy, Summer, 1987.
Leveraged Buyouts Good and Bad, Management
Review, November, 1987.
The Great Savings Snafu, Business and Society
Review, Winter, 1988.
Why Owner-Workers Are Winners, The New York
Times, January 29, 1989.
Why I Invented the ESOP LBO, Leaders,
October/November/December, 1989.
Don't Meddle With ESOPs, The Journal of
Commerce, October 2, 1989.
Looking in a Marxist Mirror, The Journal of
Commerce, January 11, 1991.
ALSO RECOMMENDED - BOOKS
Curing World Poverty: The New Role of Property,
edited by John H. Miller, C.S.C., S.T.D., Social
Justice Review, St. Louis: 1994.
Binary Economics: The New Paradigm, by Robert
Ashford and Rodney Shakespeare, University Press of
America, Lanham, Maryland: 1999.
ALSO RECOMMENDED - WRITINGS
The ESOP According to Kelso, by Stuart Nixon,
Air Line Pilot, October, 1984.
The World According to Kelso, by Steven Hayward,
Inland Business, April, 1987.
Louis Kelso, Capitalist, Bill Moyers: A World of
Ideas II, edited by Andie Tucher, Doubleday, New
York: 1990.
The Binary Economics of Louis Kelso: The Promise
of Universal Capitalism, by Robert H. A. Ashford,
Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall, 1990.
Louis Kelso's Binary Economy, by Robert Ashford,
The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1,
1996.
Binary Economic Modes for the Privatization of
Public Assets, by Jerry N. Gauche, The Journal of
Socio-Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1998.
A New Market Paradigm for Sustainable Growth:
Financing Broader Capital Ownership with Louis
Kelso's Binary Economics, by Robert Ashford, Praxis:
The Fletcher Journal of Development Studies, Vol.
XIV, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy,
Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts
University, Medford, Massachusetts: 1998.
The Theory of Productiveness: A Microeconomic
and Macroeconomic Analysis of Binary Growth and
Output in the Kelso System, by Stephen V. Kane, The
Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2000.
The Ultimate Management Team, by Chris Bayers,
WIRED, January, 2002.
Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance: A
Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, The Journal of
Employee Ownership Law and Finance, Vol. 14, No. 1,
National Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO),
Oakland, California: 2002.
Binary Economics, Fiduciary Duties, and
Corporate Social Responsibility: Comprehending
Corporate Wealth Maximization and Distribution for
Stockholders, Stakeholders, and Society, by Robert
Ashford, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 5-6, June,
2002.
"The Roman arena was technically a
level playing field. But on one side were the
lions with all the weapons, and on the other the
Christians with all the blood. That's not a level
playing field. That's a slaughter. And so is putting
people into the economy without equipping them with
capital, while equipping a tiny handful of people
with hundreds and thousands of times more than they
can use."
--Louis O. Kelso in
Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas, (1990)
Channel 34 of the Time/Warner & Channel 83 of the
RCN
Cable Television Systems in Manhattan, New York.
The Program can now be viewed on the
internet at time of cable casting at: WWW.MNN.ORG NOTE: You
must adjust viewing to reflect NYC time & click on "WATCH MNN 1" at site