|
(Originally aired: (08-19-87)
LOUIS O. KELSO
(1913-1991 RIP)

Lawyer / Economic Theorist
Author (With Mortimer Adler):

"
Investment Banker
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The program can be
viewed in its entirety by clicking the you tube link below:
Louis O. Kelso # 2- Air date: 08-19-87
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More about: LOUIS O.
KELSO
 |
|
|
 |
  |
|
 |
 |
"The
basic moral problem that faces man as he moves into the age of
automation, the age of accelerating conquest of nature, is
whether he is really fit to live in an industrial society;
whether his institutions will adjust rapidly enough; whether he
will rivet himself with an absurd institution like full
employment in the economic order when it is not only unnecessary
but unadministratable in anything but a slave society; whether
freed from the necessity to devote his brain and brawn to the
production of goods and services, he can address himself to the
work of civilization itself."
(Louis O. Kelso, 1964) |
 |
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |

ESOP: Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
The ESOP is designed to build capital ownership into
employees of a business in the course of efficiently
financing its growth or other worthwhile corporate
objectives, without touching employee paychecks or savings.
As to employees, the ESOP is that constitutionally-mandated
missing link that gives them access to credit to buy the
employer's capital stock and, without personal risk or
liability, to pay for it from the pre-tax earnings of the
assets underlying that stock. In other words, equalizing
their access to capital credit with that of the already
rich.
MUCOP: Mutual Capital Ownership Plan.
This financing method is intended to provide pooled ESOP
financing for a number of corporations while building
diversified portfolios of their stocks individually for
their employees.
CSOP: Consumer Stock Ownership Plan.
This technique is intended for use by public utilities,
banks, insurance companies, and other businesses where
long-term relationships between the producer and its
customers are the rule. Through the intelligent use of
credit, it builds capital ownership for customers while
providing unlimited low-cost financing for growth of the
corporation, thus raising the power of the consumers to pay
for their purchases of goods and services while raising the
power of the corporation to produce goods and services. It
would normally be used in conjunction with an ESOP for
employees.
GSOP: General Stock Ownership Plan.
The GSOP is designed to build capital ownership into
politically designated classes of consumers within the
jurisdiction of the authorizing government - state, local or
federal.
ICOP: Individual Capital Ownership
Plan. A financing device intended to create viable capital
estates for selected categories of individuals while opening
broad markets for equity financing by corporations.
RECOP: Residential Capital Ownership
Plan. This financing plan, in combination with commercially
insured credit financing, would enable home buyers to
purchase homes at less than 25 percent of the out-of-pocket
principal and interest cost of similar transactions today,
by having their acquisitions treated by tax and other
relevant laws as capital assets, rather than as consumer
items as at present
COMCOP: Commercial Capital Ownership
Plan. Ownership of rental structures, such as office and
apartment buildings, factories, mines, railroads, hotels,
resorts, etc., is a major source of capital cash income.
Today such structures and real estate generally are owned by
the excessively wealthy (whose resulting income is thereby
sterilized for purposes of the consumer economy and denied
to those who could use it if the financing had been COMCOP
structured), who use such acquisitions not only to satisfy
their antisocial greed, but to wipe out their income taxes.
COMCOP would enable commercial structure ownership
legitimately to be spread over large numbers of people where
it can raise their power to produce the incomes they need to
make them powerful and self-supporting consumers, maintain
their lifestyles, and to diversify their holdings in
businesses in which they become employed as capital workers.
PUBCOP: Public Capital Ownership
Plan. This plan is designed to provide low-cost financing
for capital instruments used by public bodies of all types -
office buildings, streets and sidewalks, parks, street
lighting, schools, universities, subways, waterworks,
harbors, etc. It permits broad individual ownership, through
facilities corporations, by great numbers of people, while
providing low-cost capital facilities to be leased at market
rates to cities and other municipal corporations, states,
the federal government, and other public bodies. PUBCOP is
another tool in the arsenal of binary economics to assure
that each individual can become employed as a capital worker
and that governments do not acquire economic power that
should be diffused throughout the citizenry. PUBCOP
financing would employ the dual functions of binary
financing devices. It would be a major means of eliminating
the cost of wasteful, inefficient, and inadequate public
employee pensions while providing much greater economic
security and incomes, both before and after retirement, to
public employees and others.
All of these plans are discussed and
diagramed in more detail in Democracy and Economic Power:
Extending the ESOP Revolution through Binary Economics.
Unless otherwise noted, all
material contained in this website Copyright © 2000 by
Patricia Hetter Kelso. All rights reserved, domestic and
international. Articles by guest authors are the product
and property of the individual author. Contents may be
downloaded, printed or reproduced only for
non-commercial, non-profit, educational purposes.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
 |
 |
|
|

Download Now »
© Copyright, 2000, by
Patricia H. Kelso.
All rights reserved
under International and Pan American Copyright
Conventions.
Library of Congress
Catalog Card Number:58-5268
|

Download Now »
© Copyright, 2000,
by Patricia H. Kelso.
All rights reserved
under International and Pan American Copyright
Conventions.
Library of Congress
Catalog Card Number:61-6562
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Louis Kelso's books,
The Capitalist Manifesto
and The New Capitalists,
are now available to download in PDF form. You will need
the
Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print them.
|

and together comprise the first public
statement of Louis Kelso's seminal contribution to political
economics - a thesis Mortimer J. Adler, the co-author,
declared "the first clear and systematic statement of the
idea of capitalism that has ever been presented to the
world."
Despite its Cold War title,
of
1958 is neither a defense of traditional capitalism nor a
polemical call to revolution in the style of
of
1848. It is a theoretical blueprint of the physical and
institutional structure of the western private property,
free market system identified by Adam Smith and the
classical economists; repudiated by Karl Marx and the
socialists,
and pragmatically compromised by J. Maynard Keynes. It
presents specific proposals for correcting and perfecting
the present system in the line of, and in the light of, its
own logic and principles. It invites men and women of good
will to set to work on the task of building an economically
just and generally affluent society on the foundation of a
Capitalism redeemed of its historical flaws.
Louis Kelso's vision of Capitalism was, in
Dr. Adler's description, "the economically free and
classless society which supports political democracy and
which, above all, helps political democracy to preserve the
institutions of a free society." To Dr. Adler's mind, this
conception was "the most revolutionary idea of the century."
Ten years after his death Louis Kelso is
beginning to be recognized as the originator of a genuinely
new paradigm in political economics. Although introduced
more than forty years ago, its concepts are still virgin
terrain because, despite their osmotic influence in the
United States, western and eastern Europe, Russia and now
China, relatively few people are familiar with them.
Make no mistake, Louis Kelso's ideas are
just as controversial today as when he and Dr. Adler
introduced them in 1958. The Austrian economist Schumpeter
famously defined Capitalism as "creative destruction." That
is also the effect of a new paradigm on its parent
discipline. Louis Kelso's new paradigm targets, first of
all, the conventional premises of economics. But since those
premises are also embedded in western political, economic
and business institutions, particularly the institutions of
finance, Louis Kelso's binary view exposes the fallacies at
their heart as well.
In showing the obsolete ideas at the root of
key institutions - the institutions that concentrate wealth
and frustrate the operating logic of the free market - Louis
Kelso changes the terms of the age-old debate between
Conservatives and Liberals and Capital and Labor. And in
doing that, he moves to new and higher ground the
ideological issues that have made western society a
battleground ever since the Industrial Revolution. To
understand Louis Kelso's binary paradigm is to look at the
economic and political world with new eyes, from an
exhilarating new perspective. The social implications of
this new view are revolutionary in the best sense of that
word.
Louis Kelso was fascinated by technology. He
began his investigation of the Great Depression with
painstaking research on the effects of technological change
on occupations, industries and the macro-economy. While
still in law school, he published a monograph on how the
computer, hardly invented then, would revolutionize the
practice of law. He eagerly looked forward to the day when
the computer would make instantaneous world-wide
communication possible. Unfortunately he died a few years
before the Internet could make this a reality for him.
Now as we enter the new century and the new
millennium, Louis Kelso's binary economic paradigm is even
more important than when first introduced. The demise of the
Soviet Union has left the western market economy free to
dominate the world on its own terms. Understanding market
forces and learning how to exploit them to build stable
industrial democracies that are also Good Societies for
everyone who lives in them is our most urgent task. Louis
Kelso has given us the tools - both conceptual and practical
- to accomplish this task. He has also inspired us with his
generous vision of the Good Society that advanced technology
still promises despite centuries of misunderstanding and
misuse.
In gratitude for the life and work of
Louis Kelso, and also in honor of his co-author, the late
Mortimer J. Adler, whose encouragement and collaboration
made these books possible, the Kelso Institute takes great
pleasure in electronically publishing both
and .
In so doing, we fulfill Louis Kelso's dearest wish in life -
that his ideas be made accessible to those who will use them
to build institutions that advance civilization and support
individuals in realizing their highest potential.
Unless otherwise noted, all
material contained in this website Copyright © 2000
by Patricia Hetter Kelso. All rights reserved,
domestic and international. Articles by guest
authors are the product and property of the
individual author. Contents may be downloaded,
printed or reproduced only for non-commercial,
non-profit, educational purposes. |
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Louis
O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter Kelso estimates of the relative real inputs
to production in the American economy of Labor (Physical and
Intellectual) and Capital over time assuming reasonably competitive
markets. So ingrained is the “ethic” of the “Labor Theory of Value”
that they thought it best to refer to Capital Owners as “Capital
Workers” in keeping with their understanding that Capital instruments do
“Work” - as surely as the most diligent human surrogate worker – and
that indeed the observable trend is for Capital Instruments to do ever
more of the Worlds “Work”. The reflexive prevalent attitude of equating
“Economic” man with Essential Human Values including the whole vast
array of values around the “Work Ethic” all contribute to camouflage and
maintain the fundamental miss-match between the way goods and services
are produced and distributed and particularly their trends projected
into the future. Cybernetic contributions (now almost exponential) are
only adding to the much longer Historical trend. Represents US Economy
but applies to World trending. HHC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart of concentration
of capital ownership in the U.S. over time. The same general pattern
applies to virtually all economies of and the World Economy as a whole –
Plutocratic ownership and control of the real means of production. With
“The Labor Theory of Value” it only worsens. HHC - Below Quotes @
www.kelsoinstitute.org
"Conventional wisdom says there is only one way to earn a living, and
that's to work. Conventional wisdom effectively treats
capital (land, structures, machines, and the like) as though it were a
kind of holy water that, sprinkled on or about labor, makes
it
more productive. Thus, if you have a thousand people working in a
factory and you increase the design and power of the
machinery so that one hundred men can now do what a thousand did before,
conventional wisdom says, 'Voila! The productivity
of
the labor has gone up 900 percent!' I say 'hogwash.' All you've done is
wipe out 90 percent of the jobs, and even the remaining
ten
percent are probably sitting around pushing buttons. What the economy
needs is a way of legitimately getting capital
ownership into the hands of the people who now don't have it."
(Louis O. Kelso,
Journal Asset Based Finance, 1982)
"The
trouble with today's techniques of finance is that they're designed to
make the rich richer. None are designed to make the
poor
richer. That's why the poor are poor. Because they're not rich."
(Louis O. Kelso, San
Francisco Examiner & Chronicle, 1978)
"The
Roman arena was technically a level playing field. But on one side were
the lions with all the weapons, and on the other
the
Christians with all the blood. That's not a level playing field. That's
a slaughter. And so is putting people into the economy
without equipping them with capital, while equipping a tiny handful of
people with hundreds and thousands of times more
than
they can use."
(Louis O. Kelso, Bill
Moyers: A World of Ideas, 1990)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Handy
The Hungry Spirit: Beyond Capitalism -
The Quest for Purpose in the Modern World
Broadway Books N.Y., 1998 (pages (53-54)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Keynes,
turning from economics to philosophy in his 1930 essay “Economic
Possibilities for Our Grandchildren” foresaw it all:
“We are
being afflicted with a new disease of which some readers may not yet
have heard the name, but of which they will hear a great deal of in the
years to come-namely technological unemployment. This means
unemployment due to our discovery of means of economizing the use of
labor outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses of labor ….This
means that the economic problem is not, if we look into the future, the
permanent problem of the human race.”
Keynes
goes on to say that once the economic problem is solved, mankind will be
deprived of its traditional purpose and will be faced with the real
problem, which economics will have won: how to live wisely, agreeably
and well. He doesn’t think that this will be welcomed by all.
“There is
no country and no people, I think, who can look forward to the age of
abundance without dread”
but
ultimately
“When
the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there
will be a great changes in the code of morals … we shall be able to
assess the money motive at its true value.”
Charles
Handy citing the 1930 reference by Lord John Maynard Keynes projecting
“Technological Unemployment”
for the
future world of his grandchildren. That would be right about now as
technological advancement not only
provides
the possible means for Humanity’s collective “Transcendence of Scarcity”
but poses the problem to
progressives by their commitment (along with virtually all economic
theorizing) to the “Labor Theory of Value”
currently informing virtually all National Economies on Planet Earth &
the International System as well. HHC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic thinker who sought
to find a way to preserve
capitalism from the
competition of
communism as an alternative
within the context of the early
Cold War.
Louis O. Kelso
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer
and
economic
thinker who sought to find a way to preserve
capitalism
from the competition of
communism
as an alternative within the context of the early
Cold War.
His non-conformist "capitalism"
might be compared to the
peoples' capitalism
ideas of
G. K. Chesterton
in which ownership is distributed to as many people as possible
within the economy. Kelso developed the idea of
Binary Economics
to explain the need for expanded capital ownership in light of
industrial production and the dominance of capital instead of labor.
In 1956 Louis Kelso invented the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to put his ideas into practice.
In 1958 he collaborated with the philosopher
Mortimer Adler
to write The Capitalist Manifesto that is considered the primary
source of his economic theories. Kelso and Adler followed this book
with The New Capitalists (Random House, New York: 1961). Both books
are readable online from the Kelso Institute.
Louis O. Kelso had significant
discussions concerning a
Basic Income Guarantee
with
Russell B. Long
and
Daniel Patrick Moynihan.[1]
Kelso has inspired many economic
thinkers including
James S. Albus,
Robert Ashford, and Norman Kurland
begin_of_the_skype_highlighting end_of_the_skype_highlighting.
[edit]
Publications
-
The distributive dynamics of
capitalism by Louis O Kelso, self-published; 2nd edition (1956)
-
The Capitalist Manifesto, by
Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler, Random House, New York:
1958; reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975.
Also published in French, Spanish, Greek and Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8210-7
-
The New Capitalists: A Proposal
to Free Economic Growth from the Slavery of Savings, by Louis O.
Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler, Random House, New York: 1961;
reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975. Also
published in Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8211-5
-
Two-Factor Theory: The Economics
of Reality, by Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter, Random House,
New York: 1967; paperback edition, Vintage Books: 1968.
(Originally published under the title How to Turn 80 Million
Workers into Capitalists on Borrowed Money.) Also published in
Spanish and German.
-
Democracy and Economic Power:
Extending the ESOP Revolution Through Binary Economics, by Louis
O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter Kelso, Ballinger Publishing Co.,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1986; reprinted by University Press of
America, Lanham, Maryland: 1991. Also available in Russian and
Chinese.
ISBN 0-8191-7909-4
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO
-
Karl Marx: The Almost Capitalist,
American Bar Association Journal, March, 1957.
[2]
-
Corporate Benevolence or Welfare
Redistribution?, The Business Lawyer, January, 1960.
-
Labor's Great Mistake: The
Struggle for the Toil State, American Bar Association Journal,
February, 1960.
-
Welfare State - American Style,
Challenge, The Magazine of Economic Affairs, New York
University, October, 1963.
-
The Case for the 100% Dividend
Payout, Trends (published by Georgeson & Co.), New York,
December, 1963.
-
Poverty and Profits, by
Hostetler, Kelso, Long, Oates, the Editors, Harvard Business
Review, September-October, 1964.
-
Beyond Full Employment, Title
News (the Journal of the American Land Title Association),
November, 1964.
-
Cooperatives and the Economic
Power to Consume, The Cooperative Accountant (published by the
National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives), Winter, 1964.
-
Why Not Featherbedding?,
Challenge, September-October 1966. (Reprinted in American
Controversy: Readings and Rhetoric, by Paul K. Dempsey and
Ronald E. McFarland, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview,
Illinois: 1968.)
-
The Economic Foundation of
Freedom, The American Prospect: Insights into Our Next 100
Years, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston: 1977.
-
Labor's Untapped Wealth: An
Address by Louis Kelso, Air Line Pilot, October, 1984.
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO AND
PATRICIA HETTER KELSO
-
Uprooting World Poverty: A Job
for Business, Business Horizons, Fall, 1964. (Reprinted in
Mercurio, Anno VIII, No. 8, Rome, Italy, August, 1965; Far
Eastern Economic Review, Vol. L, No. 1, Hong Kong, October,
1965. Winner of the First Place 1964 McKinsey Award for
Significant Business Writing.)
-
Poverty's Other Exit, North
Dakota Law Review, January, 1965.
-
Equality of Economic Opportunity
Through Capital Ownership, Social Policies for America in the
Seventies, edited by Robert Theobald, Doubleday & Co., New York:
1968. (Excerpts from this essay reprinted in Current, April,
1968.)
-
Reparations and the Churches,
Business Horizons, December, 1969.
-
Invisible Violence of Corporate
Finance, The Washington Post, June 18, 1972.
-
Man Without Property, Business
and Society Review, Summer, 1972.
-
Corporate Social Responsibility
Without Corporate Suicide, Challenge, July-August, 1973.
-
Employee Stock Ownership Plan,
Business & Government Insider Newsletter, July 30, August 6 and
August 13, 1973.
-
Employee Stock Ownership Plans: A
Micro-Application of Macro-Economic Theory, The American
University Law Review, Spring, 1977.
-
The Greatest Financial Planning
Tool of All . . . Could ESOP Save General Motors?, The Financial
Planner, November, 1981.
-
Sychophantasy in Economics: A
Review of
George Gilder's
Wealth and Poverty, The Great Ideas Today, Encyclopœdia
Britannica, Inc., Chicago: 1982.
-
The Right to Be Productive, The
Financial Planner, August and September, 1982.
-
Tax Reform Is Not the Answer,
Chief Executive, Spring, 1983.
-
How We Can Achieve Lifetime
Employment, Chief Executive, Autumn, 1983.
-
Damning Binary Economics With
Faint Praise, Workplace Democracy, Summer, 1987.
-
Leveraged Buyouts Good and Bad,
Management Review, November, 1987.
-
The Great Savings Snafu, Business
and Society Review, Winter, 1988.
-
Why Owner-Workers Are Winners,
The New York Times, January 29, 1989.
-
Why I Invented the ESOP LBO,
Leaders, October/November/December, 1989.
-
Don't Meddle With ESOPs, The
Journal of Commerce, October 2, 1989.
-
Looking in a Marxist Mirror, The
Journal of Commerce, January 11, 1991.
ALSO RECOMMENDED - BOOKS
-
Curing World Poverty: The New
Role of Property, edited by John H. Miller, C.S.C., S.T.D.,
Social Justice Review, St. Louis: 1994.
-
Binary Economics: The New
Paradigm, by Robert Ashford and Rodney Shakespeare, University
Press of America, Lanham, Maryland: 1999.
-
ALSO RECOMMENDED - WRITINGS
-
The ESOP According to Kelso, by
Stuart Nixon, Air Line Pilot, October, 1984.
-
The World According to Kelso, by
Steven Hayward, Inland Business, April, 1987.
-
Louis Kelso, Capitalist, Bill
Moyers: A World of Ideas II, edited by Andie Tucher, Doubleday,
New York: 1990.
-
The Binary Economics of Louis
Kelso: The Promise of Universal Capitalism, by Robert H. A.
Ashford, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall, 1990.
-
Louis Kelso's Binary Economy, by
Robert Ashford, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1,
1996.
-
Binary Economic Modes for the
Privatization of Public Assets, by Jerry N. Gauche, The Journal
of Socio-Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1998.
-
A New Market Paradigm for
Sustainable Growth: Financing Broader Capital Ownership with
Louis Kelso's Binary Economics, by Robert Ashford, Praxis: The
Fletcher Journal of Development Studies, Vol. XIV, The Fletcher
School of Law and Diplomacy, Global Development and Environment
Institute, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts: 1998.
-
The Theory of Productiveness: A
Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Analysis of Binary Growth and
Output in the Kelso System, by Stephen V. Kane, The Journal of
Socio-Economics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2000.
-
The Ultimate Management Team, by
Chris Bayers, WIRED, January, 2002.
-
Employee Ownership and Corporate
Performance: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, The Journal
of Employee Ownership Law and Finance, Vol. 14, No. 1, National
Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO), Oakland, California: 2002.
-
Binary Economics, Fiduciary
Duties, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Comprehending
Corporate Wealth Maximization and Distribution for Stockholders,
Stakeholders, and Society, by Robert Ashford, Tulane Law Review,
Vol. 76, No. 5-6, June, 2002.
"The Roman arena was
technically a
level playing field.
But on one side were the lions with all the weapons, and on the
other the Christians with all the blood. That's not a level
playing field. That's a slaughter. And so is putting people into
the economy without equipping them with capital, while equipping
a tiny handful of people with hundreds and thousands of times
more than they can use."
--Louis O. Kelso in
Bill Moyers:
A World of Ideas, (1990)
[edit]
External links
|